The term MIST has been coined by Jim O’Neil, the Goldman Sachs economist to
describe the next tier of emerging economies: Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea and Turkey. The traits shared by
these nations are - a large population and a sizeable market, a large economy
at about 1% of global GDP each and membership of esteemed G20. Let us look at
the dynamics of each economy.
Mexico: Mexico
took a quantum jump to replace Brazil in emerging market index following China,
India & Russia. The Mexican peso gained 0.3% on 3rd October 2012
after encouraging results of US employment and service sector data. US is
Mexico’s chief trading partner, hence bounce in US economy could its
neighboring economy.
A host of benefits makes Mexico an
attractive destination for US companies. Mexico is located in close proximity
that reduces the transit time drastically as compared to China. This
facilitates ‘just-in time’ delivery and curtails inventories and costs. Also, Mexico’s
legal system is much more favorable to US companies than that of China.
Mexico’s trade with US is duty free. Chinese wages have surpassed those of
Mexico in recent years. According to Nomura forecast, the GDP will grow between
3.5% & 4.5% per year in the next decade. The private sector debt remains a
miniscule 20% of GDP, while public debt is close to 35% of GDP. Inflation has
been kept in an acceptable range under 4% and the fiscal position of Government
is sound.
One of the challenges in Mexico is the war
against cartels, which has left 55000 people dead in 2012.The other being
declining oil output is due to lack of capital and craft to develop new fields.
Mexico’s uncompetitive economy tends to block new market-entrants, with local
oligopolies dominating the market. Taut labor laws & tax system exacerbate
this situation.
The investors need to be cautious when
looking at Mexico as an alternative to BRIC nations. Though the country faces certain
risks, it has promising potential in the long run.
Indonesia: It
boasts of consumer driven economy with a GDP growth of 6.5% in 2011 and 6.2% in
2010. Indonesia’s geographic location & demographic bestows it with numerous
advantages like sustainable productive workforce & easy access to ocean
trade.
Besides burgeoning middle class and
thus rising incomes, unemployment rate is strikingly low at 6.3%. It has high
literacy rates, consecutive current account surpluses & high young
population. More than half of its population is under 30.Amongst the latest
positives, is the upgrade in investment grade rating by Fitch to BBB+ from BBB-.
In spite of these opportunities, the
investors might have doubts investing here. The feeble infrastructure problems,
particularly electricity and transportation pose a tough challenge. Expediting
infrastructure investment can alleviate this. Complex regulatory environment
& corruption also affect the economy.
South Korea: It
is an export driven economy with a GDP growth of 3.6% in 2011. A $1.1 trillion
economy, South Korea showcases high purchasing power and low unemployment
rates.
In striking contrast to most economies,
which are grappled with credit rating downgrade, South Korea has, in recent
weeks, received its second credit rating upgrade up to AA- by Fitch. Korean
economy is comparatively robust as it withstood the global economic slowdown
demonstrating its economical and financial stability. The country is producing
impressive goods, thanks to the Companies like Samsung Electronics that deserve
the credit for Korean success.
Despite these affirmative characteristics,
the country is posed with challenges. Corruption makes it formidable for
companies to do business. Lack of currency convertibility and equity
settlements across multiple accounts are the problems cited by MSCI, which
gives South Korea, a developing country status. Inflexible labor market &
reliance on exports could make conducting business in this region difficult.
Turkey: The GDP growth rate
of 9% in 2010 and 8.5% in 2011 might delight China. However, Turkey is not
connected with a sustained raw materials demand from China. This can make the
Turkish economy flourish in a world with little growth opportunities.
The country has high FDI levels, which
are not directly correlated with GDP. This is evident from the fact that in ’06
and ’07, Turkey’s GDP grew by 9%. FDI dropped in ’09 and ’10 but GDP growth
remained intact. FDI levels in ’07 were reduced to half, the GDP maintaining
its position at 8.5%. Hence the country will be resistant against fluctuating
FDI levels. Public debt has fallen to 40% in 2011 from 74% in 2002. Turkey’s
recent unemployment rate is around 8.8%, which has steadily declined over the
years. With these signals, the nation is augmenting in wealth thereby creating
a bright outlook.
In contrast, there are several fallouts
to this rapid growth. The inflation rate of Turkey is hovering around 10.4%,
which is above central bank’s target. While considerable FDI levels favors the
economy, over reliance on foreign capital has widened its current account
deficit to 10% of GDP in 2011. Turkey’s block of banking system is partly owned
by Eurozone banks and Europe accounts for half of Turkey’s exports.
Despite the challenges, there is hope
than apprehension, because country is well positioned with an expanding
domestic market. A recent research paper by Dani Rodrik of Harvard University
illustrated that Income per head has tripled to around $10000 in less than a
decade. Yet, the dangers of soaring foreign capital and current account deficit
can ruffle the economy during crises.
Conclusion: MIST
nations’ growth has outperformed that of BRIC in 2011. Yet the total GDP for
MIST nations was $3.9 trillion in 2011, only one-third of BRIC’s GDP. Though
the gap is considerable, the economies have tremendous potential to grow by
leaps and bounds in coming years. This can be attributed to inviting geographic
locations, favorable demographics and increasing productivity which act as
catalysts for growth. The wavering interests of investors in BRIC due to
structural problems & over dependence on exports, MIST nations are expected
to close the GDP growth gap in long-term.